Publications | The Perryman Group
Post Thumbnail
Twenty Years of Success: The Impact of the Lubbock Economic Development Alliance on Growth in the Area Economy
Report Published on November 13, 2024

Since its inception in 2004, the Lubbock Economic Development Alliance (LEDA) has promoted economic growth via partnerships with corporations and individuals to provide a business-friendly environment and a skilled workforce in the Lubbock area. In the competitive market for quality corporate locations and expansions, proactive development efforts such as those LEDA has engaged in are essential to optimizing economic performance.

Post Thumbnail
Celebrating Fifty Years of Excellence: The Economic Impact of The University of Texas Permian Basin
Report Published on October 26, 2023

The University of Texas Permian Basin (UTPB or UT Permian Basin), now in its 50th year of operation, is the only four-year university in the area and provides the Permian Basin and beyond with qualified graduates and significant economic stimuli. The University serves a diverse student population and provides important cultural and professional resources for students, staff, and the surrounding community. The University prides itself on "thinking large and living local," which has direct economic and societal implications for the local graduates and the surrounding area.

Post Thumbnail
The High Cost of Cutting the Surplus Agricultural Products Grant
Report Published on February 10, 2021

Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, the number of Texans seeking food bank assistance has risen 200%. This dramatic increase in food insecurity has caused immeasurable stress and suffering, eroding the health and wellbeing of people across the state. In the midst of this greatly increased need for help, the surplus agricultural products grant, a key aspect of food bank support, has been drastically cut. If this reduction remains in place, the opportunity to acquire almost 20 million pounds of healthy local produce will be lost. Hunger involves quantifiable economic costs in the form of increased health care and social service needs, inferior educational outcomes, and lost productivity. The Perryman Group estimates that cutting the surplus agricultural products grant would cost the state economy hundreds of millions of dollars over time, with economic harms spreading across the entire economy. Because economic activity generates taxes, the cut would also lead to reductions in State and local taxes. State costs for health care and education would also rise due to the effects of hunger.

Post Thumbnail
The Potential Economic Benefits of Statewide Competition in the Florida Electric Power Market
Report Published on December 28, 2017

The Perryman Group was recently asked to examine the potential economic benefits of statewide competition in the Florida electric power market. Outcomes in other areas which have increased competition (fully adjusted for Florida economic and demographic patterns) were used as a basis for estimating the potential benefits.

Post Thumbnail
Essential Energy: The Economic Importance of the Permian Basin Part 1 of 2
Newsletter Published on July 07, 2022 (Vol. 39, No. 05)

The Permian Basin is among the most important oil-producing regions in the world. In addition to supplying needed energy, it also generates a substantial portion of Texas business activity. This issue highlights results of The Perryman Group's recent study of the economic and fiscal impact of the region.

Post Thumbnail
Heat! The Economic Effects of Sustained Higher Temperatures
Brief Published on July 02, 2024

In addition to the negative quality of life and health effects, excessive heat involves substantial economic costs. The Perryman Group estimated the net losses associated with recent heat conditions, as well as the potential long-term effects of hotter temperatures. During the past 12 months, the United States has been about 2.39 degrees above the twentieth-century global standard. If that pattern continues through the summer and the remainder of the year, the US economy will lose an estimated $110.2 billion in real gross product (measured in 2017 dollars) and 663,000 jobs compared to projections under normal weather conditions. As effects compound, losses could be expected to rise to $1.1 trillion in real gross product and more than five million jobs by 2050.

Post Thumbnail
The Economic Impact of the Solar Eclipse on the US and Affected States
Brief Published on March 28, 2024

On Monday, April 8, a total solar eclipse will cross North America, passing over Mexico, the United States, and Canada. The path of totality enters Texas around Eagle Pass and crosses the nation to the northeast, exiting the northeast near Houlton, Maine. More than 30 million people reside in the path of totality (including about 12 million in Texas alone).

Post Thumbnail
Economics of the 2024 Solar Eclipse
Brief Published on March 25, 2024

On Monday, April 8, a total solar eclipse will cross North America, passing over Mexico, the United States, and Canada. The path of totality enters Texas around Eagle Pass and crosses the state to the northeast, exiting near the northeast corner. About 12 million Texans reside in the path of totality, which includes the major metropolitan areas along the I-35 corridor.

Post Thumbnail
The High Cost of Heat
Brief Published on July 24, 2023

Texas has obviously experienced a heat wave of historic proportions in the summer of 2023. The higher-than-normal temperatures have created health issues for many residents and impacted quality of life for millions of people. Not surprisingly, the effects do not stop there.

Post Thumbnail
The Economic Impact of a National Rail Strike
Brief Published on October 17, 2022

Rail is a crucial component of the US logistics system, and a strike would lead to significant logistical dislocations, exacerbate ongoing supply chain challenges, put additional upward pressure on prices and, thus, do substantial economic harm. Although a tentative agreement was reached between the major railways and union representatives (with the help of Biden Administration officials), it requires ratification by union members before going into effect. One of the largest of the 12 unions recently rejected the package, and concern has been expressed by several others.