Post Thumbnail
The High Cost of Cutting the Surplus Agricultural Products Grant
Report Published on February 10, 2021

Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, the number of Texans seeking food bank assistance has risen 200%. This dramatic increase in food insecurity has caused immeasurable stress and suffering, eroding the health and wellbeing of people across the state. In the midst of this greatly increased need for help, the surplus agricultural products grant, a key aspect of food bank support, has been drastically cut. If this reduction remains in place, the opportunity to acquire almost 20 million pounds of healthy local produce will be lost. Hunger involves quantifiable economic costs in the form of increased health care and social service needs, inferior educational outcomes, and lost productivity. The Perryman Group estimates that cutting the surplus agricultural products grant would cost the state economy hundreds of millions of dollars over time, with economic harms spreading across the entire economy. Because economic activity generates taxes, the cut would also lead to reductions in State and local taxes. State costs for health care and education would also rise due to the effects of hunger.

Why is the China trade war impacting farmers in Texas?
Radio Spot Broadcast via Texas State Networks on August 14, 2019

The effects of the trade war with China are beginning to have a negative effect on Texas farmers.

Why did farmers get a second round of payments, and how else could the situation be handled?
Radio Spot Broadcast via Texas State Networks on May 28, 2019

Dr. Ray Perryman says the second round of payments to farmers hurt by our trade policy with China, like the first round, doesn't make a lot of sense.